We plus noticed conceptual resemblances amongst the Filipino size getting social positions and outcomes and many off Goldberg’s (1982) conceptually-derived groups to possess social jobs, dating, and you will outcomes in the English vocabulary. Specifically, Filipino Prominence seems to include terminology into the Goldberg’s Fame, Influence, Prominence, and you will Affluence kinds. Filipino Uselessness (inversely) is much like Goldberg’s Ability classification. Personal conceptual correspondences are also noticeable between Filipino Attractiveness and you can Goldberg’s Attractiveness, and you can between Filipino Respectability and Goldberg’s Respect. Filipino Charisma generally seems to include the majority of Goldberg’s Attention, Appeal, and you can Recreation-value classes, and several conditions within the Goldberg’s Focus class in addition to convergence which have Filipino Individuality. Filipino Dangerousness resembles Goldberg’s Popularity, Fearsomeness, and you may Antagonism kinds, and you may Filipino Destructiveness as well as overlaps which have Goldberg’s Antagonism. Naturally, two Filipino dimensions which can be outlined mainly of the actual attribute terms, Fuel and you will Presentableness, do not frequently correspond directly to virtually any out-of Goldberg’s groups regarding societal roles and outcomes (though Goldberg’s Styles group boasts “presentable” since the an expression). We wish to keep in mind that we don’t attempt to make marker balances having Goldberg’s (1982) conceptual kinds in addition to their self-statement construction from the English language try not familiar. Complete, although not, our conceptual analysis shows that there was a great deal of cross-cultural similarity throughout the major types of societal spots and you will consequences, and that the Goldberg’s much more simple conceptual groups you are going to blend towards wide proportions in self-declaration analysis.
Loads of Goldberg’s less groups, as well as Nurturance, Succorance, Adjustment, Understanding, Liability, Forgivability, Trend, Politics, Gender, and you may Faith do not showcase much abstract resemblance towards the Filipino dimensions of societal and you will bodily functions
Playing with mutual component and you will regression analyses, we showed that every social and you may physical feature proportions have been moderately so you can strongly related datingmentor.org/disabled-dating/ a minumum of one Filipino attribute and you can evaluative proportions. The new clearest exception are the tiny Presentableness dimension. Despite the character-benefits judgments of your Filipino informants, the fresh new Presentableness dimension, that was made up of appearance services (e.g., presentable, brush vs. dirty), might provide reduced facts about identification versus other social and you will physical feature proportions. Simultaneously, the brand new Stature and you can Attractiveness size-more another public and you can bodily feature size-frequently target features which can be rather collection of conceptually from the Filipino trait and evaluative dimensions.
Brand new correlations discovered anywhere between the social proportions together with trait trait size suggest that terms to have societal opportunities, statuses, and you can consequences could possibly get reflect public effects from the brand of characteristics. Actually, Angleitner mais aussi al. (1990) suggested you to definitely public positions and you can statuses reflect the newest effect one to qualities provides into someone else. Instance, Filipinos that have Gregariousness qualities are usually explained by on their own and others with regards to the social characteristics define this new Charm dimension (e.g., grounds joy otherwise delight). Similarly, Filipinos that have Conscientiousness traits could be explained inside regards to Respectability public properties (e.g., respectable, honorable). Such it is possible to links anywhere between attributes and social reputations is looked at directly in upcoming search from the correlating self-evaluations to the feature size with observer product reviews toward personal and you will physical feature dimensions.
In particular, given the dating from self-imagined appeal so you can personal really-being (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995), and body visualize so you’re able to each other thinking-value and you will eating conditions (Mintz & Betz, 1988), the Appeal dimensions could render an essential addition within the logical analysis
A practiced implication of our abilities is the fact not as much was missing because of the evaluating precisely the Filipino feature and evaluative proportions. In reality, given the results of new mutual component investigation ( Dining table 2 ), specific terminology to own public and you will real qualities could even be additional to current trait and you can evaluative bills. Although not, if one was to add additional size, beyond the attribute and you will evaluative proportions, the most likely individuals will be Stature and you may Appeal. The fresh new Prominence measure perform assess self-sensed social status or condition, since Attractiveness measure do evaluate worry about-imagined actual attractiveness and you will charm.
